← Back to Knowledge Base

Process Safety & Change Control

Management of Change (MOC): Process Safety Review and Approval

How to screen technical and temporary changes for hazards, required reviews, approvals, training and return to service.

Independent HSE guide9 min readHigh Risk

Overview

A seemingly small change to equipment, chemical service, software, operating procedure or temporary bypass can alter the plant's hazard profile. A robust MOC identifies the proposed change and technical basis, evaluates impacts on process and worker safety, updates drawings and procedures, secures competent approvals and communicates changed controls before use. US OSHA PSM requirements at 1910.119(l) apply to covered processes; projects outside that scope must follow their governing legal and contractual system. This guide supports review rather than granting permission to make a change.

Main Hazards

  • • Temporary bypass of an interlock or protective device without risk acceptance
  • • Change in process fluid, pressure or operating sequence not reflected in hazard analysis
  • • Changed piping or electrical connection not reflected on P&IDs
  • • Maintenance crews unaware of revised isolation boundaries
  • • Temporary change retained indefinitely without review
  • • Unapproved return to service following a change

Essential Controls

  1. 1Document change scope, initiating reason, affected equipment and the intended operating period.
  2. 2Identify applicable technical, process, maintenance, HSE and operational reviewers.
  3. 3Evaluate consequences for safeguards, compatibility, isolation, alarms and emergency response.
  4. 4Define approval and authorization criteria before field implementation.
  5. 5Update affected P&IDs, operating documents, permits and training materials.
  6. 6Communicate the change to affected employees and contractors before start-up.
  7. 7Track temporary-change expiry and verify reinstatement or formal permanent conversion.

Common Mistakes

  • ×Labelling a substantive modification as 'like-for-like' without confirming equivalence.
  • ×Approving a bypass by email without hazard review or expiry.
  • ×Updating drawings after the equipment has already restarted.
  • ×Failing to include contractors who work on affected systems.

Field verification and hold points

  • ✓The change and its technical reason are described unambiguously
  • ✓Risk and safeguard impacts were reviewed by competent persons
  • ✓Required approvals, operating updates and permits are complete
  • ✓Affected workers and contractors received change communication
  • ✓Temporary change end date and revalidation are assigned

Stop-work decision and escalation

Stop implementation or startup when an unapproved bypass, missing safety review, incomplete procedure update or unresolved protection gap is identified.

Technical References

OSHA links lead to official US regulations. Always confirm local legal requirements, scope of applicability, and site-specific procedures. Other listed sources remain informational references until their official links are verified.

Need More Guidance?

Use the SERNEM technical guide for management of change (moc): process safety review and approval alongside the site-approved permit, engineering package, inspection records and related field forms. Ask SERNEM AI to review missing controls.

Ask SERNEM AI →